Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/slug of the project on email verification page #4839

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Oct 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced email verification process by improving slug handling for verification links.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured correct slug is passed for verification continuation, improving user experience.

@kkatusic kkatusic self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 10, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 10, 2024 2:05pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the EmailVerificationIndex component by introducing a new state variable querySlug to manage the slug from the router query. An useEffect hook is added to update querySlug whenever the router's slug changes. The component's link construction is updated to utilize querySlug, ensuring accurate slug handling for verification continuation. The overall structure of the component remains unchanged, with a focus on improving slug management.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx Added querySlug state variable and implemented useEffect to update it based on router query changes. Updated link href to use querySlug.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • MohammadPCh
  • HrithikSampson

Poem

In the land of code, where slugs do roam,
A new query found its way back home.
With querySlug in hand, we journey forth,
Linking with care, proving our worth.
Hops of joy in every line,
For verification now works just fine! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (3)

86-91: LGTM: Synchronizing querySlug with router's slug.

The useEffect hook correctly updates querySlug when the router's slug changes. This ensures that the local state is always in sync with the URL parameter.

Consider adding a null check before the type assertion:

if (slug && typeof slug === 'string') {
  setQuerySlug(slug);
}

This would provide better type safety and prevent potential runtime errors if slug is unexpectedly null or not a string.


109-109: LGTM: Updated Link to use querySlug.

The Link component now correctly uses querySlug instead of directly accessing the router's slug. This ensures that the link always has the most up-to-date slug value.

Consider adding a fallback for when querySlug is undefined:

href={slugToVerification(querySlug || '')}

This would prevent potential issues if slugToVerification doesn't handle undefined inputs, and it removes the need for the type assertion.


Line range hint 81-109: Summary: Improved slug management for email verification.

The changes effectively address the issue of managing the project slug on the email verification page. By introducing querySlug state and synchronizing it with the router's slug, the component ensures that the correct slug is always used when constructing the verification continuation link.

These modifications improve the reliability of the email verification process, particularly in scenarios where the slug might change or be initially undefined. The implementation is solid, with only minor suggestions for enhanced type safety and error handling.

Consider adding error logging or handling for cases where the slug might be unexpectedly missing or invalid. This could help in debugging potential issues in production.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95abb06 and 763480f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/views/verification/EmailVerificationIndex.tsx (1)

81-81: LGTM: New state variable for managing the slug.

The introduction of querySlug state variable is a good approach to manage the slug from the router query. Initializing it as undefined is appropriate, considering that the slug may not be immediately available.

Copy link
Collaborator

@CarlosQ96 CarlosQ96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit de88812 into develop Oct 16, 2024
3 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the fix/success_link_loading branch October 16, 2024 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants